Analysis of medical malpractice clams and measures proposed by the Health Professionals Ethics Federal Committee of Ethiopia: review of the three years proceedings.

BACKGROUND Mediccil malpractice is professional negligence by a healthcare provider in which the treatment provided falls below the starndard and causes injury or death to the patient. OBJECTIVE To describe the adverse medical events, claims and decisions taken by the Ethiopian Health Professionals Ethics Committee at the Federal level. METHODS A three-year report of the Ethics Committee and relevant documents of proclamations and regulations were reviewed. RESULTS Between January 2011 and December 2013, the committee reviewed 60 complaints against health professionals. About one third of the complaints were filed by the patients and/or their families, about 32% by the police or court and the rest were filed by Addis Ababa health bureau, health professionals and other unrelateed observers. Thirty-nine complaints were related to death of the patient and 15 complaints were about disability. Twenty-five of the claims were against Obstetric and Gynecology specialists and 9 were against general surgeons. The committee verified that 14 of the 60 claims hadethical breach and/or negligence (incompetence). The committee took reasonable time to review complaints and respond the concerned authorities. CONCLUSION The study showed that of the total claims lower than a quarter (23.3%) were proven beyond the benefit ofdoubt. More than 3/4 (76.7) of the complaints were wrong. Hospitals should lead in preventing patient injury. Creation of more awareness among Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists, General and Orthopaedic Surgeons about medical errors is needed and special training should be given.to those joining these specialities.